Goto Blog Home PageRevell Research Systems: Alastair Revell's Web Log
On this page....
<January 2020>

RSS 2.0     Atom 1.0     CDF

Blog Roll
About Alastair Revell
Alastair Revell is the Managing Consultant of Revell Research Systems, a Management and Technology Consulting Practice based at Exeter in the United Kingdom.
Contact Alastair Revell
 EMail Revell Research Systems Limited Email Me
Legal & Other Notices
Sign In
The material published in this web log is for general purposes only. It does not constitute nor is it intended to represent professional advice. You should always seek specific professional advice in relation to particular issues. The information in this web log is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions.

Web Log Home | Welcome to this Web Log | Using this Web Log | New to Blogs? | About Revell Research Systems | Contact Details

Review Entries for Day Saturday, May 31, 2008

I can’t believe just how many web designers claim that their web sites are compliant with the standards when they are demonstrably not!

I’m talking in particular about the World Wide Web (W3C) consortium’s standards for HTML and XHTML. You’ve probably seen their compliance logos proudly displayed on web sites that claim to comply. The standards are exacting and very unforgiving on slips in the code. A particular page either complies or it does not, but this is nothing particularly challenging for a professional discipline that is used to such binary situations.

The standards are important for all sorts of reasons, not least because there is a greater chance that more browsers will render the sites as intended, that search engines are more likely to index them properly and that people using less popular browsers because of their disabilities are more likely to be able to access them.

There are standards in many different professions and one thing you expect of professionals working in those fields is that they will work to them. Indeed, they would be unprofessional if they did not.

I find it contemptible that an increasing number of web designers will proudly place the W3C’s compliance logo with a link to test the page in question against the W3C’s validator, which when clicked shows not just one or two errors, but hundreds. The fact that they link to the validator when the page is riddled with serious errors clearly indicates that they have little regard for their clients.

Do not get me wrong. I know how hard it is to keep a web page compliant, particularly since many editing tools seem to delight in surreptitiously inserting non-compliant elements in to them. However, there is a clear difference between a casual slip and complete disregard for the standards. It is those that are just sticking the badge on and misleading their clients that anger me.

What makes me so angry about this particular issue, though, is that it goes to the very heart of professionalism within our field. It must surely be a tenet in any profession that those in it do not misrepresent the truth to their clients or to the general public.
More about Alastair Revell

Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:56:25 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [2] Web Design | Trackback

RSS 2.0 Feed If you enjoyed reading an article on this blog, why not subscribe to the RSS 2.0 feed to receive future articles?
Revell Research Systems Logo Visit the Revell Research Systems Web Site if you want to learn more about this management and technology consulting practice.