Goto Blog Home PageRevell Research Systems: Alastair Revell's Web Log
On this page....
Archive
<July 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

RSS 2.0     Atom 1.0     CDF

Summary
Search
Navigation
Categories
Blog Roll
About Alastair Revell
Alastair Revell is the Managing Consultant of Revell Research Systems, a Management and Technology Consulting Practice based at Exeter in the United Kingdom.
Contact Alastair Revell
 EMail Revell Research Systems Limited Email Me
Copyright
Legal & Other Notices
Sign In
Disclaimer
The material published in this web log is for general purposes only. It does not constitute nor is it intended to represent professional advice. You should always seek specific professional advice in relation to particular issues. The information in this web log is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions.

Web Log Home | Welcome to this Web Log | Using this Web Log | New to Blogs? | About Revell Research Systems | Contact Details

Review Entries for Day Tuesday, July 18, 2006
I have been very concerned for sometime about the rather blasé attitude that banks sometimes take towards security when dealing with their customers.
More about Alastair Revell

Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:05:29 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] Security | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Thursday, July 13, 2006
I believe that a really useful administrative facility that should be built into Microsoft Windows is the ability to login as a user by using an administrator's credentials.
More about Alastair Revell

Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:50:30 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] Security | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Wednesday, July 05, 2006

The Register recently reported that Bexley Care Trust had lost a considerable amount of Microsoft Exchange Data. One of the Register's sources asserts that this was due to "primitive backup procedures". Another anonymous source interviewed by them suggested the server was six years old and that the tape heads were badly worn. They also suggested that the trust had been warned over six months ago that the UPS battery needed replacing.

I doubt Bexley Care Trust will be the only organisation to suffer such problems.

I think many organisations have come to assume that their systems will run and run. They have done so for years, so why assume they won't continue to do so? The reality is that sooner or later disaster will strike. Many organisations are loathed to properly fund their information technology (IT) infrastructure, simply increasing the risk of a disaster occurring. Indeed, some organisations seem to feel so immune from disaster that they fail in the most basic areas of disaster recovery, namely in backing up properly.

If reported accurately, it is clear that the warning signs were there at Bexley Care Trust: UPS battery on the blink and an old server.

Sloppy backup procedures are far too common. Very few organisations test and in many SME firms the attitude towards this important procedure is completely blasé. Did no one check the backup logs on a regular basis at Bexley Care Trust? I fear not otherwise someone would have noticed that backups were failing (assuming they were being done!)

More about Alastair Revell

Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:16:56 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] General | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Sunday, June 18, 2006

I note from Somasegar's blog that Microsoft are to rebrand their forthcoming WinFX technologies as .NET Framework 3.0. (S Somasegar is Microsoft's Corporate Vice-President of the Developer Division.)

This is essentially the existing .NET 2.0 Framework combined with the new WinFX technologies. The new technologies are Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Communication Foundation (WCF), Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) and Windows Card Space (WCS), together with some supporting new base class libraries.

It is apparent that this name change has not met with universal approval from the developer community.

However, it is equally clear that many people were finding it difficult to understand exactly how WinFX fitted in with Microsoft's overall strategy. In particular, a number of people seem to believe that WinFX was to replace the .NET Framework. In technical terms, WinFX has only ever been an extension of the existing .NET Framework 2.0.

I actually think that in some respects WinFX is a better name for the .NET Framework, since it is clear that the .NET Framework is destined to be the new way of programming Windows. WinFX is really the next step in the Win16 and Win32 series...

Ultimately, I'm happy with Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 (WinFX).

More about Alastair Revell

Sunday, June 18, 2006 12:01:41 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] .NET | Coding | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Thursday, June 15, 2006

I understand that Bill Gates is to step down from his day-to-day work at Microsoft, while retaining the chairmanship and providing input on major developments.

I wonder what effect this might have on Microsoft's future direction...

More about Alastair Revell

Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:38:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] General | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Monday, June 12, 2006
Are Menus Passe as far as Microsoft is concerned?
More about Alastair Revell

Sunday, June 11, 2006 11:09:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] General | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Saturday, June 10, 2006
I believe that bannering, along with other coding standards, makes code more approachable and therefore more valuable. It especially helps with maintenance and re-use, where the current programmer may not be the original developer. Making code more approachable is important to commercial organisations looking to maximise their return-on-investment (ROI). However, such standards tend to be derided by developers who predominantly work on their own because they cannot see the value.
More about Alastair Revell

Saturday, June 10, 2006 12:07:15 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [2] Coding | Trackback

Review Entries for Day Monday, June 05, 2006
I remain concerned about the possibility of "taking out" a Microsoft Exchange server, especially one installed as part of Small Business Server.
More about Alastair Revell

Monday, June 05, 2006 2:07:51 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] Security | Trackback

RSS 2.0 Feed If you enjoyed reading an article on this blog, why not subscribe to the RSS 2.0 feed to receive future articles?
   
Revell Research Systems Logo Visit the Revell Research Systems Web Site if you want to learn more about this management and technology consulting practice.