Goto Blog Home PageRevell Research Systems: Alastair Revell's Web Log
On this page....
Archive
<February 2020>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
1234567

RSS 2.0     Atom 1.0     CDF

Summary
Search
Navigation
Categories
Blog Roll
About Alastair Revell
Alastair Revell is the Managing Consultant of Revell Research Systems, a Management and Technology Consulting Practice based at Exeter in the United Kingdom.
Contact Alastair Revell
 EMail Revell Research Systems Limited Email Me
Copyright
Legal & Other Notices
Sign In
Disclaimer
The material published in this web log is for general purposes only. It does not constitute nor is it intended to represent professional advice. You should always seek specific professional advice in relation to particular issues. The information in this web log is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions.

Web Log Home | Welcome to this Web Log | Using this Web Log | New to Blogs? | About Revell Research Systems | Contact Details

Review Entries for Day Saturday, September 16, 2006

I've recently noticed that the .NET Framework Version 3.0 (which is currently in the late beta stage) is unlikely to run on anything earlier than Windows XP SP2.

The likely consequence of this is that some software developed over the next couple of years will not run on Windows 2000. This is probably early notice to business to move on from Windows 2000.

I suspect that at least part of the reason that the next version of the framework will not run on anything earlier is simply that Microsoft does not want corporates to hang on to Windows 2000 in the same way they managed to hang onto Windows NT.

This touches on a theme that I think is becoming increasingly important: platform stability. The problem for IT professionals generally is reconciling the speed at which new technology becomes available with becoming sufficiently experienced with it to provide genuine value to the business that pays for it.

Although new technology can and does provide competitive advantage, continually changing and upgrading the entire system can be draining and lead to costly mistakes.

There is no doubt that business IT needs to be continually moving forward, but it must do so smoothly. Sudden, seismic changes can be very damaging and I believe generally should be avoided.

I say generally very cautiously though because I am acutely aware that discontinuous change is a huge source of competitive advantage. The art is spotting which big changes will deliver the biggest blows to the competitors and then implementing them.

However, the fact remains that simply pursuing all change can exhaust an organisation. The most successful organisations are probably those that have sufficient elasticity to absorb the competitively important changes quickly while remaining intelligent about those options which they pursue. It’s just another aspect of being agile. The important point here, though, is to be intelligently agile.

More about Alastair Revell

Saturday, September 16, 2006 8:57:53 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #
Comments [0] .NET | Competitiveness | Trackback

Comments are closed.
RSS 2.0 Feed If you enjoyed reading an article on this blog, why not subscribe to the RSS 2.0 feed to receive future articles?
   
Revell Research Systems Logo Visit the Revell Research Systems Web Site if you want to learn more about this management and technology consulting practice.